Axiomatic design tool

Author: s | 2025-04-25

★★★★☆ (4.2 / 3584 reviews)

cell numbers tracking

Axiomatic Design Tool version 1.0 by Kummailil. Version: 1.0. File name: Axiom.exe. Categories. Windows. Log in / Sign up. Windows › Education › Science › Axiomatic Design Tool › 1.0. Axiomatic Design Tool 1.0. Request. Download. link when available. Axiomatic Design Tool 1.0 Free Choose the most

rocket.chat 2.10.5

Overview of Axiomatic Design Axiomatic Design Tools Symmetric

Presentation on theme: "1Weaver Innovation Tool: Axiomatic Design (A Brief Introduction) Jonathan Weaver UDM ME Department."— Presentation transcript: 1 1Weaver Innovation Tool: Axiomatic Design (A Brief Introduction) Jonathan Weaver UDM ME Department 2 2Weaver References Nam P. Suh, The Principles of Design, Oxford Series on Advanced Manufacturing, 1990. K. Yang & B. El-Haik, Design for Six Sigma: A Roadmap for Product Development, McGraw Hill, 2003. Deo & Suh, Axiomatic Design of Customizable Automotive Suspension, Proceedings of ICAD2004, ICAD-2004-38. Lui & Soderborg, Improving an Existing Design Based on Axiomatic Design Principles, Proceedings of ICAD2000, ICAD-055. 3 3Weaver Axiomatic Design Most principally based on the work of Nam Suh at MIT The ultimate goal of Axiomatic Design is to establish a science base for design and to improve design activities by providing the designer with a theoretical foundation based on logical and rational thought processes and tools. Other goals: –To make human designers more creative –Reduce the random search process –Minimize the iterative trial-and-error process –Determine the best designs among those proposed –Endow the computer with creative power through the creation of the science base for the design field 4 4Weaver Axiomatic Design (Cont.) Complete coverage of Axiomatic design is a very long endeavor; here we’ll just introduce it Axioms are general principles or self-evident truths that cannot be derived or proven to be true except that there are no counter-examples or exceptions. Two axioms were identified by examining the common elements that are always present in good designs, be it a

Download rufus 3.21

Axiomatic Design Tool - reviewpoint.org

Product, process, or systems design. They were also identified by examining actions taken during the design stage that resulted in dramatic improvements. 5 5Weaver Axiomatic Design (Cont.) The two Axioms: –Independence Axiom: The independence of Functional Requirements (FRs) must be always maintained, where FRs are defined as the minimum number of independent functional requirements that characterize the design goals. –Information Axiom: Among those designs that satisfy the Independence Axiom, the design that has the smallest information content is the best design. 6 6Weaver Axiomatic Design (Cont.) Violating Axiom 1 results in a coupled design Violating Axiom 2 results in system complexity 7 7Weaver Axiomatic Design (Cont.) The Independence Axiom is often misunderstood. Many people confuse between the functional independence with the physical independence. The Independence Axiom requires that the functions of the design be independent from each other, not the physical parts. The second axiom would suggest that physical integration is desirable to reduce the information content, if the functional independence can be maintained. Both axioms can be illustrated using a faucet as an example. 8 8Weaver Axiomatic Design (Cont.) Let’s discuss the ‘classic’ faucet design problem from the perspective of axiomatic design –What are the two principle functional requirements? –What are the two principle design parameters? –Is it axiomatic? 9 9Weaver Axiomatic Design (Cont.) How about now? 10 10Weaver Axiomatic Design (Cont.) Matrices can be an effective way to understand the mapping between functional parameters and design parameters For the faucet design examples: 11 11Weaver Axiomatic Design (Cont.) In

AN AXIOMATIC DESIGN SOFTWARE TOOL FOR DECISION

Dark matter dominated [80] so that V * ( R ) ≪ V D M ( R ) at all relevant radii [80,83]. This limit requires implausibly low stellar masses [84], and is directly contradicted by the observed dependence of rotation curve shape on surface brightness [28,45,81,82,85,86,87,88]. 2.2. Predictions for Rotation Curves“Rotation curves calculated on the basis of the observed mass distribution and the modified dynamics should agree with the observed velocity curves”.—M. Milgrom [16]This simple statement has a variety of testable consequences.Property 5.Flat Rotation Curves.The striking flatness of the rotation curves of spiral galaxies [89,90] was an animating motivation for both dark matter and MOND. That they are observed to be so is thus not an a priori prediction. It is nevertheless a test: one should not observe galaxies that show a Keplerian decline. So far, rotation curves remain flat indefinitely far out [91,92].Do the data corroborate the prediction of MOND?Yes.Was the prediction made a priori?No: flat rotation curves were the motivation for MOND, not a prediction thereof. The theory takes flat rotation curves to be axiomatic, an expectation that could be falsified but has not been [91].What does dark matter predict?Flat rotation curves were a primary motivation for dark matter, not a prediction thereof. It is generally possible to fit a variety of dark matter halos to the data, once given [93,94]. It is another matter to predict rotation curves a priori. It is easy to build plausible-seeming models with rotation curves that are not as flat as. Axiomatic Design Tool version 1.0 by Kummailil. Version: 1.0. File name: Axiom.exe. Categories. Windows. Log in / Sign up. Windows › Education › Science › Axiomatic Design Tool › 1.0. Axiomatic Design Tool 1.0. Request. Download. link when available. Axiomatic Design Tool 1.0 Free Choose the most Axiomatic design is investigated as a design methodology for large or complex system design. Particular considerations of system design are described and the suitability of axiomatic design for such considerations is discussed. Then, tools to enable successful application of axiomatic design to systems are developed.

Axiomatic Design Tool - Download, Screenshots

2092 Accesses AbstractThe basic concepts and the framework of Axiomatic Design (AD) provide powerful tools in the design of products and product families, especially for visualizing the design goals and improving the design process. When learning how to apply AD, however, nearly a half of the uninitiated designers like students may need to devote much effort to advance a sufficient number of different design concepts in terms of functional requirements (FRs) and/or design parameters (DPs), which is often done in abstract phrases like the first step in AD. The instructors must encourage them to think freely and squeeze out all the FRs and DPs they have in their minds and must guide them to integrate FRs functionally and DPs physically to obtain the desired design matrix. Similar content being viewed by others ReferencesNakao M, Iino K (2018) Students list FRs chronologically and DPs spatially, and need to integrate FRs functionally and DPs physically. In: Puik E, Foley JT, Cochran D, Betasolo M (eds) 12th international conference on axiomatic design (ICAD). MATEC web of conferences, Reykjavík, Iceland Google Scholar Suh NP (2001) Axiomatic design—advances and applications. Oxford University Press Google Scholar Thompson MK (2013) Improving the requirements process in axiomatic design theory. In: Annals of the CIRP, 1, vol 62, pp 115–118 (2013) Google Scholar Download references Author informationAuthors and AffiliationsThe University of Tokyo, Tokyo, JapanMasayuki Nakao & Kenji IinoAuthorsMasayuki NakaoYou can also search for this author in PubMed Google ScholarKenji IinoYou can also search for this author in PubMed Google

AXIOMATIC DESIGN AS A CREATIVE INNOVATION TOOL

The ideal case of total independence, the matrix mapping functional requirements to design parameters is square and diagonal, the design is called uncoupled and each design parameter can be manipulated to meet a particular functional requirement without affecting the other parameters or functions Design Parameters DP1DP2DP3DP4 Functions FR1X FR2 X FR3 X FR4 X 12 12Weaver Axiomatic Design (Cont.) In the decoupled case, the matrix is upper/lower triangular. The design may be treated as uncoupled if the design parameters are fixed in the order dictated by the matrix Design Parameters DP1DP2DP3DP4 Functions FR1X FR2XX FR3XXX FR4XXXX 13 13Weaver Axiomatic Design (Cont.) In the coupled case (highly undesirable), the matrix is populated above and below the main diagonal (possibly completely populated). There is an innovation opportunity with such designs if they can be decoupled! Design Parameters DP1DP2DP3DP4 Functions FR1XXXX FR2XXXX FR3XXXX FR4XXXX 14 14Weaver Axiomatic Design (Cont.) Consult Nam Suh’s work for details on the conceptualization process of mapping functional requirements to physical solutions, and ultimately to processes. 15 15Weaver Automotive Suspension Example (based on Deo & Suh’s paper) Problem: comfort/handling tradeoffs involving damping and stiffness of suspension Active suspensions have drawbacks: power, size weight, cost This paper looks at adaptive systems wherein some design parameters are changed in response to some information A novel adaptive suspension architecture is proposed which allows independent control of stiffness, damping and ride height 16 16Weaver Prior Art on Variable Stiffness and Ride Height A typical solution is an air spring, but as shown below,

AXIOMATIC DESIGN AS A CONSU LTANCY TOOL IN

Of action subjects Plaintiffs to criminal and civil liability under the CTA (See Dkt. #6 at p. 2; Dkt. #18 at p. 5). And “there is no doubt that the CTA will be applied 18 with its full force.” NSBU v. Yellen, 721 F. Supp. 3d 1260, 1271 (N.D. Ala. 2024). It is axiomatic that the Government does not defend the CTA in this litigation simply for the sake of litigating— the CTA and its implementing regulations would be aspirational were it not for its robust penalty provisions. See 31 U.S.C. § 5336(h). Thus, “the [P]laintiffs’ fear of prosecution [is] not imaginary or wholly speculative.” See Susan B. Anthony List, 573 U.S. at 160.4 Accordingly, Plaintiffs have clearly established an injury in fact sufficient to satisfy this prong of the standing inquiry. Second, the CTA’s enforcement would require Plaintiffs to incur increased regulatory burdens, which alone are sufficient to confer standing. See Contender Farms L.L.P., 779 F.3d at 266. The CTA and Reporting Rule, by FinCEN’s own admission, will cause reporting companies to incur at least some compliance costs. “FinCEN estimates that it will cost the majority of the 32.6 million domestic and foreign reporting companies that are estimated to exist as of the January 2024 effective date approximately $85 apiece to prepare and submit an initial [beneficial owner information] report.” 87 Fed. Reg. at 59550, 59562. FinCEN also estimates that it will take approximately twenty minutes to read a beneficial ownership report form and understand it, thirty minutes to

Axiomatic design theory as a design thinking tool for mastering

Is there not to be an axiomatic truth, but instead each speck of data must be slowly inhaled while carefully performing a deep search inside oneself to find the true metaphysical sense... Hi!I did find in my initial try–out of the DEX software that it's hopeless trying to use it on a 15.6 inch lappy as all the fancy "Office–Style" ribbons and all the other eye–candy, etc., take up too much space!It did seem to run OK without many of the graphical glitches that plagued early versions of his software tho!My friend's treated me to a replacement desktop monitor for Christmas, so I'll transfer my Design Spark, DEX, Splan, etc., onto the Optiplex I got to do all my PCB work on and see how it goes then!I'm going to try the "Poptronix" Audio Sweep Generator Project from October 1973 on the DEX program – this was only offered as a kit with no pcb layouts given in the original article!Chris Williams Logged It's an enigma that's what it is!! This thing's not fixed because it doesn't want to be fixed!! Print Search Pages: Prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8] All Go Up. Axiomatic Design Tool version 1.0 by Kummailil. Version: 1.0. File name: Axiom.exe. Categories. Windows. Log in / Sign up. Windows › Education › Science › Axiomatic Design Tool › 1.0. Axiomatic Design Tool 1.0. Request. Download. link when available. Axiomatic Design Tool 1.0 Free Choose the most Axiomatic design is investigated as a design methodology for large or complex system design. Particular considerations of system design are described and the suitability of axiomatic design for such considerations is discussed. Then, tools to enable successful application of axiomatic design to systems are developed.

complete express

Mapping FRs to DPs in Axiomatic Design Axiomatic

To introduce symbolic “geometric scenes” that have symbols representing constructs such as points, and then to define geometric objects and relations in terms of them. For example, here’s a geometric scene representing a triangle a, b, c, and a circle through a, b and c, with center o, with the constraint that o is at the midpoint of the line from a to c: &#10005GeometricScene[{a,b,c,o},{Triangle[{a,b,c}],CircleThrough[{a,b,c},o],o==Midpoint[{a,c}]}]On its own, this is just a symbolic thing. But we can do operations on it. For example, we can ask for a random instance of it, in which a, b, c and o are made specific: &#10005RandomInstance[GeometricScene[{a,b,c,o},{Triangle[{a,b,c}],CircleThrough[{a,b,c},o],o==Midpoint[{a,c}]}]]You can generate as many random instances as you want. We try to make the instances as generic as possible, with no coincidences that aren’t forced by the constraints: &#10005RandomInstance[GeometricScene[{a,b,c,o},{Triangle[{a,b,c}],CircleThrough[{a,b,c},o],o==Midpoint[{a,c}]}],3]OK, but now let’s “play Euclid”, and find geometric conjectures that are consistent with our setup: &#10005FindGeometricConjectures[GeometricScene[{a,b,c,o},{Triangle[{a,b,c}],CircleThrough[{a,b,c},o],o==Midpoint[{a,c}]}]]For a given geometric scene, there may be many possible conjectures. We try to pick out the interesting ones. In this case we come up with two—and what’s illustrated is the first one: that the line ba is perpendicular to the line cb. As it happens, this result actually appears in Euclid (it’s in Book 3, as part of Proposition 31)— though it’s usually called Thales’s theorem.In 12.0, we now have a whole symbolic language for representing typical things that appear in Euclid-style geometry. Here’s a more complex situation—corresponding to what’s called Napoleon’s theorem: &#10005RandomInstance[ GeometricScene[{"C", "B", "A", "C'", "B'", "A'", "Oc", "Ob", "Oa"}, {Triangle[{"C", "B", "A"}], TC == Triangle[{"A", "B", "C'"}], TB == Triangle[{"C", "A", "B'"}], TA == Triangle[{"B", "C", "A'"}], GeometricAssertion[{TC, TB, TA}, "Regular"], "Oc" == TriangleCenter[TC, "Centroid"], "Ob" == TriangleCenter[TB, "Centroid"], "Oa" == TriangleCenter[TA, "Centroid"], Triangle[{"Oc", "Ob", "Oa"}]}]]In 12.0 there are lots of new and useful geometric functions that work on explicit coordinates: &#10005CircleThrough[{{0,0},{2,0},{0,3}}] &#10005TriangleMeasurement[Triangle[{{0,0},{1,2},{3,4}}],"Inradius"]For triangles there are 12 types of “centers” supported, and, yes, there can be symbolic coordinates: &#10005TriangleCenter[Triangle[{{0,0},{1,2},{3,y}}],"NinePointCenter"]And to support setting up geometric statements we also need “geometric assertions”. In 12.0 there are 29 different kinds—such as "Parallel", "Congruent", "Tangent", "Convex", etc. Here are three circles asserted to be pairwise tangent: &#10005RandomInstance[GeometricScene[{a,b,c},{GeometricAssertion[{Circle[a],Circle[b],Circle[c]},"PairwiseTangent"]}]]Going Super-Symbolic with Axiomatic TheoriesVersion 11.3 introduced FindEquationalProof for generating symbolic representations of proofs. But what axioms should be used for these proofs? Version 12.0 introduces AxiomaticTheory, which gives axioms for various common axiomatic theories.Here’s my personal favorite axiom system: &#10005AxiomaticTheory["WolframAxioms"]What does this mean? In a sense it’s a more symbolic symbolic expression than we’re used to. In something like 1 + x we don’t say what the value of x is, but we imagine that it can have a value. In the expression above, a, b and c are pure “formal symbols” that serve an essentially

INTEGRATING AXIOMATIC DESIGN INTO A DESIGN FOR

1,936PASCO scientificData...that allows users to draw directly on the graph...to the smart tool, scale-to-fit, curve fitting858Software CompanionsViewCompanion Pro lets you view, print, annotate, and convert several file formats including Adobe PDF...using snap to drawing geometry. Calibration...if your drawings are not in the correct scale417Radom-TGIS ObjectLand processes data organized as geoinformation database (GDB). Basic GDB components are maps...displaying themes on arbitrary scale; - spatial data input...also by interactive drawingfree315SomePDF.comConvert PDF to Html format - Easy, Fast and Free! Some PDF to Html Converter can easily make your PDF...Convert PDF to Html format - Easy, Fast and Free! Some PDF to Html Converter can easily make308VeryPDF IncVeryPDF PDF2HTML is a powerful yet easy to use application that allows you to convert PDF files to HTML files in just...bookmarks, images and vector drawings...to optimize and scale HTML codefree184Advanced Data Analytics, Inc.inteliCharts Free stock market charting software delivers powerful stock...parameters editor, advanced drawing...cloning in logarithmic scale settings, multiple116NBOS SoftwareFractal Mapper is a high-powered mapping system that lets gamers create a wide variety of of maps...Fractal based drawing tools for realistic...Print to 1 inch scale for miniatures. Scripting115Leadwerks Corporation3D World Studio is a map editor designed for use with DarkBASIC Professional...3D World Studio is a map editor designed for use with DarkBASIC Professional, Torque Game Enginefree109Fabien CoulonThis geometry program is for educational purposes and it allows proving and verifying geometrical...axiomatic geometry. It allows drawing basic geometrical elements like83Star-WatermarkStar Watermark Professional is a powerful and easy-to-use tool to watermark your images...Star Watermark Professional is a powerful and easy-to-use tool to watermark your images, photos70DWGPDF.net Inc.Advanced DWG to PDF Workshop converts DWG and DXF files to vector PDFs...and layout from your drawing are retained, making...the ability to scale for conversion, combine68pdf-to-html-word.comEasy PDF to HTML Converter is a powerful yet easy to use application...bookmarks, images and vector drawings...to optimize and scale HTML code60Isoplotec CorporationRTL,DXF,DWG,GERBER,NC-PloView displays PDF, HPGL, HPGL-2, HP RTL,DXF,DWG,GERBER...line length measurement (4) Edit drawing (Comment function) *...Rotate copy, Scale Up/Down copy49Software Advice, Inc.QuoteExpress Sheet Metal Estimating includes an accurate and customizable...takeoff right on the drawing – scale, add to listing...bidding – emails, quotes, drawings, schedules45The Electric Quilt CompanyElectric Quilt 7 does it all from block drafting to designing with true-to-scale fabric swatches, from double-checking patterns...designing with true-to-scale fabric swatches ...popular quick-quilts, or draw your own layoutfree39Alexander TsyplakovMatrixer is a piece of software especially suited for teaching...and doing medium-scale applied research...Table editor -Fast drawing of function plots according28MoodySoft, Inc.SPX Graphic Editor is a software application whose central purpose...options will be to draw a circle, a rectangle ...flip, rotate, invert, scale, blur, sharpen24DWGPDF Inc.Advanced DWG to PDF Workshop is a program that allows you to batch convert DWG and DXF...AutoCAD. You can scale your conversion using Extents...to include in your drawing or suppress24KAIDEXIPU (Beijing) Software Co., Ltd.CADSee Plus provides quick viewing and printing of AutoCAD DWG, DWF...CADSee Plus provides a drawing file print function...direction, and print scale, etcfree20Pangaea CAD SolutionsThe DualCAD project is an ongoing project "over 17 years" to create a freeware cad application...reference files to your drawing. Axiomatic Design Tool version 1.0 by Kummailil. Version: 1.0. File name: Axiom.exe. Categories. Windows. Log in / Sign up. Windows › Education › Science › Axiomatic Design Tool › 1.0. Axiomatic Design Tool 1.0. Request. Download. link when available. Axiomatic Design Tool 1.0 Free Choose the most Axiomatic design is investigated as a design methodology for large or complex system design. Particular considerations of system design are described and the suitability of axiomatic design for such considerations is discussed. Then, tools to enable successful application of axiomatic design to systems are developed.

DESIGN AND DEPLOYMENT OF AXIOMATIC DESIGN

Unexpected interruption, he could be justifiably smug that the movie completed shooting in just 93 days.Wolper had no illusions about the movie business and did not believe in the notion that any studio or producer possessed a magic touch, much though that was a line given out by any filmmaker enjoying a bout of success. “Audiences are very selective nowadays,” he said. “The moviegoer has an antenna that goes up if they like a film. If the antenna doesn’t go up nothing will drag him in.”Wolper decide to launch the picture with an old-fashioned “local” world premiere. Ever since Cecil B. DeMille premiered The Buccaneer (1938) in New Orleans, this had turned into a major marketing device, with movies having first showings in a variety of small towns and cities all over America linked to a location shoot or birthplace of a star. The idea had long been out of fashion but since the original author was now a respected West Virginia Congressman, the movie premiered at the Keith-Albee cinema in Huntingdon, the mayor declaring a “Remagen Week” and tanks rolling through the streets as part of a publicity blitz.By the time The Bridge at Remagen appeared, Wolper was a big-time indie producer, having splashed out $500,000 pre-publication on John Updike’s Couples to be directed by Joseph L. Mankiewicz (never made). Also on his agenda were: The Confessions of Nat Turner to star James Earl Jones with first Norman Jewison at the helm then Sidney Lumet, an original screenplay by Mort Fine (The Pawnbroker, 1964) called The Blessed McGill, The Great Cowboy Race from a screenplay by Abe Ginnes, Three Women (renamed I Love My Wife, 1970) and King, Queen Knave (1972) based on the Nabokov novel.It’s axiomatic of the vagaries of Hollywood for even the most successful producers that

Comments

User3094

Presentation on theme: "1Weaver Innovation Tool: Axiomatic Design (A Brief Introduction) Jonathan Weaver UDM ME Department."— Presentation transcript: 1 1Weaver Innovation Tool: Axiomatic Design (A Brief Introduction) Jonathan Weaver UDM ME Department 2 2Weaver References Nam P. Suh, The Principles of Design, Oxford Series on Advanced Manufacturing, 1990. K. Yang & B. El-Haik, Design for Six Sigma: A Roadmap for Product Development, McGraw Hill, 2003. Deo & Suh, Axiomatic Design of Customizable Automotive Suspension, Proceedings of ICAD2004, ICAD-2004-38. Lui & Soderborg, Improving an Existing Design Based on Axiomatic Design Principles, Proceedings of ICAD2000, ICAD-055. 3 3Weaver Axiomatic Design Most principally based on the work of Nam Suh at MIT The ultimate goal of Axiomatic Design is to establish a science base for design and to improve design activities by providing the designer with a theoretical foundation based on logical and rational thought processes and tools. Other goals: –To make human designers more creative –Reduce the random search process –Minimize the iterative trial-and-error process –Determine the best designs among those proposed –Endow the computer with creative power through the creation of the science base for the design field 4 4Weaver Axiomatic Design (Cont.) Complete coverage of Axiomatic design is a very long endeavor; here we’ll just introduce it Axioms are general principles or self-evident truths that cannot be derived or proven to be true except that there are no counter-examples or exceptions. Two axioms were identified by examining the common elements that are always present in good designs, be it a

2025-03-27
User8321

Product, process, or systems design. They were also identified by examining actions taken during the design stage that resulted in dramatic improvements. 5 5Weaver Axiomatic Design (Cont.) The two Axioms: –Independence Axiom: The independence of Functional Requirements (FRs) must be always maintained, where FRs are defined as the minimum number of independent functional requirements that characterize the design goals. –Information Axiom: Among those designs that satisfy the Independence Axiom, the design that has the smallest information content is the best design. 6 6Weaver Axiomatic Design (Cont.) Violating Axiom 1 results in a coupled design Violating Axiom 2 results in system complexity 7 7Weaver Axiomatic Design (Cont.) The Independence Axiom is often misunderstood. Many people confuse between the functional independence with the physical independence. The Independence Axiom requires that the functions of the design be independent from each other, not the physical parts. The second axiom would suggest that physical integration is desirable to reduce the information content, if the functional independence can be maintained. Both axioms can be illustrated using a faucet as an example. 8 8Weaver Axiomatic Design (Cont.) Let’s discuss the ‘classic’ faucet design problem from the perspective of axiomatic design –What are the two principle functional requirements? –What are the two principle design parameters? –Is it axiomatic? 9 9Weaver Axiomatic Design (Cont.) How about now? 10 10Weaver Axiomatic Design (Cont.) Matrices can be an effective way to understand the mapping between functional parameters and design parameters For the faucet design examples: 11 11Weaver Axiomatic Design (Cont.) In

2025-04-09
User9703

2092 Accesses AbstractThe basic concepts and the framework of Axiomatic Design (AD) provide powerful tools in the design of products and product families, especially for visualizing the design goals and improving the design process. When learning how to apply AD, however, nearly a half of the uninitiated designers like students may need to devote much effort to advance a sufficient number of different design concepts in terms of functional requirements (FRs) and/or design parameters (DPs), which is often done in abstract phrases like the first step in AD. The instructors must encourage them to think freely and squeeze out all the FRs and DPs they have in their minds and must guide them to integrate FRs functionally and DPs physically to obtain the desired design matrix. Similar content being viewed by others ReferencesNakao M, Iino K (2018) Students list FRs chronologically and DPs spatially, and need to integrate FRs functionally and DPs physically. In: Puik E, Foley JT, Cochran D, Betasolo M (eds) 12th international conference on axiomatic design (ICAD). MATEC web of conferences, Reykjavík, Iceland Google Scholar Suh NP (2001) Axiomatic design—advances and applications. Oxford University Press Google Scholar Thompson MK (2013) Improving the requirements process in axiomatic design theory. In: Annals of the CIRP, 1, vol 62, pp 115–118 (2013) Google Scholar Download references Author informationAuthors and AffiliationsThe University of Tokyo, Tokyo, JapanMasayuki Nakao & Kenji IinoAuthorsMasayuki NakaoYou can also search for this author in PubMed Google ScholarKenji IinoYou can also search for this author in PubMed Google

2025-04-25
User7403

The ideal case of total independence, the matrix mapping functional requirements to design parameters is square and diagonal, the design is called uncoupled and each design parameter can be manipulated to meet a particular functional requirement without affecting the other parameters or functions Design Parameters DP1DP2DP3DP4 Functions FR1X FR2 X FR3 X FR4 X 12 12Weaver Axiomatic Design (Cont.) In the decoupled case, the matrix is upper/lower triangular. The design may be treated as uncoupled if the design parameters are fixed in the order dictated by the matrix Design Parameters DP1DP2DP3DP4 Functions FR1X FR2XX FR3XXX FR4XXXX 13 13Weaver Axiomatic Design (Cont.) In the coupled case (highly undesirable), the matrix is populated above and below the main diagonal (possibly completely populated). There is an innovation opportunity with such designs if they can be decoupled! Design Parameters DP1DP2DP3DP4 Functions FR1XXXX FR2XXXX FR3XXXX FR4XXXX 14 14Weaver Axiomatic Design (Cont.) Consult Nam Suh’s work for details on the conceptualization process of mapping functional requirements to physical solutions, and ultimately to processes. 15 15Weaver Automotive Suspension Example (based on Deo & Suh’s paper) Problem: comfort/handling tradeoffs involving damping and stiffness of suspension Active suspensions have drawbacks: power, size weight, cost This paper looks at adaptive systems wherein some design parameters are changed in response to some information A novel adaptive suspension architecture is proposed which allows independent control of stiffness, damping and ride height 16 16Weaver Prior Art on Variable Stiffness and Ride Height A typical solution is an air spring, but as shown below,

2025-04-08
User9800

Is there not to be an axiomatic truth, but instead each speck of data must be slowly inhaled while carefully performing a deep search inside oneself to find the true metaphysical sense... Hi!I did find in my initial try–out of the DEX software that it's hopeless trying to use it on a 15.6 inch lappy as all the fancy "Office–Style" ribbons and all the other eye–candy, etc., take up too much space!It did seem to run OK without many of the graphical glitches that plagued early versions of his software tho!My friend's treated me to a replacement desktop monitor for Christmas, so I'll transfer my Design Spark, DEX, Splan, etc., onto the Optiplex I got to do all my PCB work on and see how it goes then!I'm going to try the "Poptronix" Audio Sweep Generator Project from October 1973 on the DEX program – this was only offered as a kit with no pcb layouts given in the original article!Chris Williams Logged It's an enigma that's what it is!! This thing's not fixed because it doesn't want to be fixed!! Print Search Pages: Prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8] All Go Up

2025-04-17
User2155

To introduce symbolic “geometric scenes” that have symbols representing constructs such as points, and then to define geometric objects and relations in terms of them. For example, here’s a geometric scene representing a triangle a, b, c, and a circle through a, b and c, with center o, with the constraint that o is at the midpoint of the line from a to c: &#10005GeometricScene[{a,b,c,o},{Triangle[{a,b,c}],CircleThrough[{a,b,c},o],o==Midpoint[{a,c}]}]On its own, this is just a symbolic thing. But we can do operations on it. For example, we can ask for a random instance of it, in which a, b, c and o are made specific: &#10005RandomInstance[GeometricScene[{a,b,c,o},{Triangle[{a,b,c}],CircleThrough[{a,b,c},o],o==Midpoint[{a,c}]}]]You can generate as many random instances as you want. We try to make the instances as generic as possible, with no coincidences that aren’t forced by the constraints: &#10005RandomInstance[GeometricScene[{a,b,c,o},{Triangle[{a,b,c}],CircleThrough[{a,b,c},o],o==Midpoint[{a,c}]}],3]OK, but now let’s “play Euclid”, and find geometric conjectures that are consistent with our setup: &#10005FindGeometricConjectures[GeometricScene[{a,b,c,o},{Triangle[{a,b,c}],CircleThrough[{a,b,c},o],o==Midpoint[{a,c}]}]]For a given geometric scene, there may be many possible conjectures. We try to pick out the interesting ones. In this case we come up with two—and what’s illustrated is the first one: that the line ba is perpendicular to the line cb. As it happens, this result actually appears in Euclid (it’s in Book 3, as part of Proposition 31)— though it’s usually called Thales’s theorem.In 12.0, we now have a whole symbolic language for representing typical things that appear in Euclid-style geometry. Here’s a more complex situation—corresponding to what’s called Napoleon’s theorem: &#10005RandomInstance[ GeometricScene[{"C", "B", "A", "C'", "B'", "A'", "Oc", "Ob", "Oa"}, {Triangle[{"C", "B", "A"}], TC == Triangle[{"A", "B", "C'"}], TB == Triangle[{"C", "A", "B'"}], TA == Triangle[{"B", "C", "A'"}], GeometricAssertion[{TC, TB, TA}, "Regular"], "Oc" == TriangleCenter[TC, "Centroid"], "Ob" == TriangleCenter[TB, "Centroid"], "Oa" == TriangleCenter[TA, "Centroid"], Triangle[{"Oc", "Ob", "Oa"}]}]]In 12.0 there are lots of new and useful geometric functions that work on explicit coordinates: &#10005CircleThrough[{{0,0},{2,0},{0,3}}] &#10005TriangleMeasurement[Triangle[{{0,0},{1,2},{3,4}}],"Inradius"]For triangles there are 12 types of “centers” supported, and, yes, there can be symbolic coordinates: &#10005TriangleCenter[Triangle[{{0,0},{1,2},{3,y}}],"NinePointCenter"]And to support setting up geometric statements we also need “geometric assertions”. In 12.0 there are 29 different kinds—such as "Parallel", "Congruent", "Tangent", "Convex", etc. Here are three circles asserted to be pairwise tangent: &#10005RandomInstance[GeometricScene[{a,b,c},{GeometricAssertion[{Circle[a],Circle[b],Circle[c]},"PairwiseTangent"]}]]Going Super-Symbolic with Axiomatic TheoriesVersion 11.3 introduced FindEquationalProof for generating symbolic representations of proofs. But what axioms should be used for these proofs? Version 12.0 introduces AxiomaticTheory, which gives axioms for various common axiomatic theories.Here’s my personal favorite axiom system: &#10005AxiomaticTheory["WolframAxioms"]What does this mean? In a sense it’s a more symbolic symbolic expression than we’re used to. In something like 1 + x we don’t say what the value of x is, but we imagine that it can have a value. In the expression above, a, b and c are pure “formal symbols” that serve an essentially

2025-04-22

Add Comment