Latency mon

Author: h | 2025-04-25

Latency mon . Highest measured interrupt to process latency ( s): 619.90 Average measured interrupt to process latency ( s): 12. Highest measured interrupt to DPC latency ( s):

Високий Latency Mon - Overclockers.ua

Buffer Size21.3 input and output latency-43ms driver compensation for a total of -.33ms dn83 Posts: 218 Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 6:06 pm Location: USA Post by dn83 » Sat Aug 18, 2007 4:30 pm Hey there, thanks for the reply and suggestions. Well, I can't really change the drivers because I'm using a Mac and it just uses a class compliant driver.Anyway, something you mentioned could also be it - driver error compensation. I recently started putting in a driver error compensation value, when before I just kept it at the default of 0.00 ms. I'm going to set mine back to zero and see if that clears it up... bhuvan Posts: 19 Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 3:41 pm Location: Dubai Contact: Post by bhuvan » Mon Aug 20, 2007 4:59 pm I'm having similar problems with Ableton. My setup is: Live 6 on an AMD Laptop. Clock speed - 2GHz. RAM - 1GB. Soundcard - MOTU Traveler (Firewire).At a certain point in the session, when there are a few plug-ins and tracks, each time I hit play, I have to wait for a few seconds of coughing and spluttering before the audio output is smooth. Sometimes even in the middle of playback, the CPU usage can suddenly jump from 35% to 140% and cause the engine to start coughing again for 5-10 seconds.Changing audio buffer size hasn't helped. (And I need relatively low latency if I'm recording with many tracks running alongside.)Is there a solution? Am I going wrong somewhere? MacBook Pro 15", Mac OSX 10.5.5, Logic Studio 8, Ableton Live 8.1.5, MOTU Traveler, Dynaudio BM6A, novation ZeRO SL MkII, novation Launchpad, M-Audio Ozonic, M-Audio MK449C dn83 Posts: 218 Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 6:06 pm Location: USA Post by dn83 » Mon Aug 20, 2007 10:29 pm What sample rate are you using, 44100kHz?Try setting Buffer Size (under Latency on the Audio tab) to 512 or so (mine works fine at 256). Then, set Plug-In Buffer Size (on the CPU tab) to 128 or so instead of "As Audio Buffer" (mine's set at 64)...Also, be sure

Question - latency mon kernel timer latency issue

Help guys. I downloaded the drivers in the links you provided, and restarted my machine twice, but nothing changed. I am not seeing ASIO Saffire as a choice in the driver dropdown? It just shows ASIO, and when I select it it only shows one Audio Device as before. Wish I could cut and paste the screen print in here. But it looks like the Forum doesn't allow it.I also uninstalled the old version of asio4all.Frustrating. Which link is supposed to download the ASIO Saffire driver so "ASIO Saffire" shows up as a driver choice?Thanks, Dan pencilrocket Posts: 1718 Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:46 am Re: For ASIO driver, Ableton only shows 1 Audio Device Post by pencilrocket » Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:55 pm fishmonkey wrote:asio4all is like a virus now...so... the other asio drivers programmd by the other developer runs with more latency than asio4all should be deleted by AVS. I have just reported them to mcafee. Donnie Posts: 810 Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 3:16 pm Location: Chicago Suburbs Contact: Re: For ASIO driver, Ableton only shows 1 Audio Device Post by Donnie » Tue Jun 10, 2014 4:47 pm pencilrocket wrote:fishmonkey wrote:asio4all is like a virus now...so... the other asio drivers programmd by the other developer runs with more latency than asio4all should be deleted by AVS. I have just reported them to mcafee.Asio4all's reported latency, or actual latency? It seems like every time I thought I was getting better latency with asio4all a closer

Question - Audio issue? latency mon

Am Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 11:17 am Posts: 36 Quote:At the moment the stand alone version of Stereo Tool ONLY works in 2-channel mode though, so it's not useable for you if you want more than 2 channels.The VST version is still 2-channel only too, right? Only get three out pins in my host, two for the L & R channels and 1 for latency, or should it be enabled somewhere? And I agree, it's best to subtract the LFE channel AFTER processing through Stereo Tool (with Voxengo BMS for example), another possibility is to bypass it altogether if you already have a LFE channel, but in this case you will have to take care of the delay caused by Stereo Tool's latency, else your LFE channel will be ahead of the other five. Top djnforce9 Post subject: Re: Multi-channel audio.PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 4:30 pm Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2012 3:38 pm Posts: 70 I still think it would be nice if the support was built right into the standalone version of Stereo Tool itself so no third party applications would be needed and the potential compatibility issues that lie therein. Even if it was a premium feature, I'd pay for the support of having Stereo Tool manifested as a Windows audio device that bridges your sound card accordingly. Top hvz Post subject: Re: Multi-channel audio.PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 12:38 am Site Admin Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:40 am Posts: 11414 I know, but the solution would be identical to what you get if you use Virtual Audio Cable - for example a Breakaway Pipeline *IS* a Virtual Audio Cable. There appear to be very few implementations of something like this. Top. Latency mon . Highest measured interrupt to process latency ( s): 619.90 Average measured interrupt to process latency ( s): 12. Highest measured interrupt to DPC latency ( s): Vas Is there a good alternative to Latency Mon or other utility to use for audio computers? The free DPC Latency Checker used to be a great alternative. The website gives

Latency mon : r/computer_help - Reddit

Here. 1. Not as bad as I remember, but not the best either. It will probably be fine for long term use. Just be wary of any random shutdowns in the future.2. Take a screen cap of the Motherboard section of the HWinfo and post it. I would also look through all the sensors and take pictures of any temps you are not sure of what they are.3. Run latency monitor in the background during a gaming session with a game that has issues. Then screen cap the latency mon application to post here. #15 "I dont think my mobo supports temperature monitoring since I cant find VRM temps on hwinfo."Enable monitoring for the disabled Section. Should be right click then enable monitoring in the drop down menu.If already enabled, disable it then reenable it. Last edited: May 21, 2021 #16 1. Not as bad as I remember, but not the best either. It will probably be fine for long term use. Just be wary of any random shutdowns in the future.2. Take a screen cap of the Motherboard section of the HWinfo and post it. I would also look through all the sensors and take pictures of any temps you are not sure of what they are.3. Run latency monitor in the background during a gaming session with a game that has issues. Then screen cap the latency mon application to post here. Alright, so I ran latencymon and was ruunning around without stuttering and I got this image: View: ran it again and started running around. I kept stuttering and I had this result: View: happened withouut stuttering: View: happened when i was in-game withouut stuttering and then tabbed out: View: screenshot: View: and I also did a clean boot and it did nothing Aug 12, 2011 5,487 2,667 35,140 #17 Alright, so I ran latencymon and was ruunning around without stuttering and I got this image: Oh and I also did a clean boot and it did nothing Do you have both kits of RAM installed in the computer? If so try just the new kit. When you installed the new and old motherboards did you make sure to screw in all the motherboard standoff screws into the case standoffs? Do a once over on the internals looking for a short. You could even go as far as building the computer outside of the case to see if the behavior changes. @Eximo @Hellfire13 @USAFRet @Karadjgne I am just about out of ideas, can anyone of you guys take a look? Dec 26, 2012 30,756 4,555 142,790 #18 Some game engines just do not like to be 'tabbed' as it messes with ram resources, timings and data pass

Latency Mon - Cubase - Steinberg Forums

- TwitterNeed help? Our support team will be happy to help and can be reached at this link. Ryan_IK Senpai Posts: 1452Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 4:20 pm Re: irig2 and Android phone/tablet, no apps? by ak1 » Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:59 pm Thanks for the quick reply, I'll look up that one as well.Honestly, I was thinking that $34 (what I paid) for this might get me in decent shape for impromptu jams and traveling so I won't have to bring my processors, especially considering I have latest gen tablet and Android phone.BTW, Tonebridge app plays great, unfortunately can't edit the patches, at least from what I am seeing. Very low latency though, I like it! Last edited by ak1 on Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:44 pm, edited 1 time in total. ak1 Posts: 34Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 6:08 am Re: irig2 and Android phone/tablet, no apps? by Ryan_IK » Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:05 pm That is completely understandable. We hope your experience with these third party apps is a positive one. Feel free to shoot me a PM with any feedback you'd like me to pass along. Personally, on non-SAPA compatible devices, I would suggest the iRig UA and AmpliTube UA hardware/software combo. The iRig UA offers a DSP chip which acts as the 'brain' of the AmpliTube UA app. This allows for a universal experience on Android devices. This combo will only require USB Host compatibility and Android 4.2 or later to operate properly.Read

Can find solution with LATENCY MON

Stratodan Posts: 2 Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 6:26 pm For ASIO driver, Ableton only shows 1 Audio Device Hi, brand new user. Just bought a Focusrite Scarlett 2i4 interface which came with Ableton Live 9 Lite. I made all the connections and did some recording over the past few days.In the Audio Preferences section I've read that I should be using ASIO as my driver to reduce latency. But when I choose ASIO as my driver type, it only allows for one Audio Device. There is no Input or Output audio device that shows up on the screen.When I choose MME/DirectX as the driver type, it allows me to input my Scarlett 2i4 device in the Audio Input Device field, and again in the Audio Output Device field. My recording so far (just out of the gate) seem ok, but I'm told I should be using ASIO.I'm using Ableton Live 9 Lite 9.1.2 and I just reinstalled the ASIO drivers (free ASIO for all). Then restarted my PC (Windows 7). But same result. When I choose ASIO as the Driver Type, I only get one Audio Device to choose from (Focusrite is there). Also when I choose ASIO, it won't let me adjust the Buffer size or input or output latency settings.What am I doing wrong?Thanks,Dan Stratodan Posts: 2 Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 6:26 pm Re: For ASIO driver, Ableton only shows 1 Audio Device Post by Stratodan » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:28 pm Thanks for the

latencymon.com - LatencyMon - Download Free (La - Latency Mon

Prev 1 2 Next Page 1 of 2 Recommended Posts Is there anyway to lower the DPC latency while running AIDA64? I get periodic spikes in DPC latency while running AIDA64 to monitor temps on my G19. Sometimes my audio playback will skip because of this; any help would be much appreciated Quote Please let us know more about your system configuration:1) Motherboard model2) CPU type3) Video card (or cards) model4) Number of internal or external hard disk drives or SSD5) Any special sensor devices connected6) Windows variant, kernel type (32-bit or 64-bit)Thanks,Fiery Quote post a screenshot of latencymon. there are no instances of dpc spiking caused by the aida driver in my system. Quote Author Posted December 29, 2010 1) Gigabyte EX58-UD52) i7 9303) GTX 4804) 2x Intel SSDs in RAID0, 3x1TB Caviar Green in RAID0 (ICH10R)5) No sensor devices 6) Win7 Pro x64I've attached a picture of the dpc latency, it spikes fairly regularly while leaving AIDA64 running. Quote Latency Monitor, that screenshot is useless it doesn't indicate which driver the DPC spike is from. Quote i believe i got also some latency issues, last day i was playback some music and got sound stutter regularly. I'm not sure aid64 was launched or not but it may be. Next time I'll check with latency mon to be sure. Quote In case the latency spikes are approx. 20 seconds away from each other -- as it seems --, then I suppose it's caused by the SMART detection layer of AIDA64, which is used to measure HDD/SSD temperature. AIDA64 now uses a special driver call to pass through the Intel Rapid Storage RAID drivers, in order to reach the RAID member drives. I guess Intel drivers will need some more iterations to mature Quote Author Posted December 30, 2010 Thanks for all the replies. LatencyMon reports everything as ok but closing it and running DPC latency checker will show periodic spikes. May just be the Intel RST drivers as Fiery stated, I recently moved to the new v10 that was released on 12/15. Thanks again. Quote in my testing, DPC Latency checker can actually cause dpc spikes under recent versions of windows. Quote Is there a difference between Latency Monitor and DPC Latency Checker? Just curious. I use DPC Latency Checker ever since you guys mentioned it here, I didn't know about it. No drop-outs for me on Windows 7 Pro 64. Quote latency monitor actually displays the driver at fault, and has extended DPC information including a DPC amount counter.Excessive DPC activity is just as problematic as high dpc spikes. the driver used is also more recently updated then dpc latency checker. Quote Thanks for the info about the. Latency mon . Highest measured interrupt to process latency ( s): 619.90 Average measured interrupt to process latency ( s): 12. Highest measured interrupt to DPC latency ( s):

usbport.sys high in Latency Mon - Cubase - Steinberg Forums

Forum: VirtualDJ Technical SupportQuesto argomento è obsoleto e potrebbe contenere informazioni obsolete o errate. I accepted the updated version offer for VDJ and lost all sound quality. The sound quality is horrific, totally bad, even if I use Itunes without VDJ my sound quality is terrible. The sound is now scratchy and choppy when I use my Bose controller and clear when I use my MAC built in sound option. This is the first time I have ever had a problem coming out of my Bose sound system on my MAC OSX 7.5. This is also the first time VDJ has interfered with the function of ITUNES. Please Help. Inviato Mon 14 Aug 17 @ 4:39 am klausmogensenPRO InfinityMember since 2006 user8919661 wrote :This is also the first time VDJ has interfered with the function of ITUNES. Please Help. Are you sure it's VDJ? I don't see how it can technically do that when not in useAlso bad sound quality is not a general issue with any new version of VDJ - I'm using the latest version right nowYou can go back a version (link below), but I don't think it'll make any difference - especially not when not in use Inviato Mon 14 Aug 17 @ 6:02 am music234PRO InfinityMember since 2008 MAC OSX 7.5 really? How old is your Mac?? Inviato Mon 14 Aug 17 @ 6:21 am hh73PRO InfinityMember since 2006 i use a pc. but i have actually noticed the sound quality is vastly improved since the last 5 build. enough that i dont need traktor or serato. i do now save to .wav format on the highest setting. but before it sounded like i was mixing with 128k mp3s. Inviato Mon 14 Aug 17 @ 12:42 pm hh73PRO InfinityMember since 2006 to the OP. have you checked your latency, maybe somehow that got moved up or down? Inviato Mon 14 Aug 17 @ 12:47 pm SaxManTonyHome userMember since 2014 Ok I took advantage of the simplest approach first and downloaded the previous version and now everything is working normally. I have an early 2008 MAC upgraded to OSX 7.5 with 6 gigs of ram.Based on the comments I received I would think that there is a setting that could be checked and validated with the newer version of VDJ. Can someone send me the steps or approach to assure proper functioning after installation of the latest version. Inviato Mon 14 Aug 17 @ 3:49 pm hh73PRO InfinityMember since 2006 the new updates, if you have the enableautoupdate or whatever is called enabled. are silent. and usually painless. it will just update next time you launch vdj Inviato Mon 14 Aug 17 @ 5:49 pm (Vecchi argomenti e forum sono automaticamente chiusi)

Latency mon results and help - Tom's Hardware Forum

Mikrotik Training Videos - FREE - *Update 03/15/2010* #48 Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:06 pm Can't wait to the cat nail you Hilton, I'm glad to see you are so concerned with my personal well being...hehehe doctor just joined Posts: 12 Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:48 am Re: Basic Mikrotik Training Videos - FREE - *Update 03/15/20 #49 Thu Apr 08, 2010 5:08 am hii greg thnx for ur effort .. i have a ques , i provide internet to clients of about 100 , my prob is that whenever a problem occurs in a single client all others are affected , high latency ping times are shown , even wireless links are affected with latency , but when i block this client everything works fine .. my ques is how to isolate each client on network so that no one is affected ? gregsowell Member Candidate Topic Author Posts: 128 Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 1:24 am Contact: Re: Basic Mikrotik Training Videos - FREE - *Update 03/15/20 #50 Thu Apr 08, 2010 5:14 pm hii greg thnx for ur effort .. i have a ques , i provide internet to clients of about 100 , my prob is that whenever a problem occurs in a single client all others are affected , high latency ping times are shown , even wireless links are affected with latency , but when i block this client everything works fine .. my ques is how to isolate each client on network so that no one is affected ?Doctor,You would be better served asking this question as a new topic in the beginner forum as you will have many users offering advice. I would say that you first need to find out what they are doing that is affecting you so you know how to properly combat the issue. Are they using too much bandwidth, are they attacking other users, are they attacking your infrastructure, etc? doctor just joined Posts: 12 Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:48 am Re: Basic Mikrotik Training Videos - FREE - *Update 03/15/20 #51 Thu Apr 08, 2010 8:47 pm well , actually sometimes it's just a virus affecting and attacking the whole network , sometimes a client network card that is causing the high ping delays and other stupid reasons that break down the network ... i tried firewall filters rules for blocking virus but no effect cuz they may pass through network pcs be4 passing through mikrotik .. what do u think we can do greg ? gregsowell Member Candidate Topic Author Posts: 128 Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 1:24 am Contact: Re: Basic Mikrotik Training Videos - FREE - *Update 03/15/20 #52 Fri Apr 09, 2010 4:24 am If you are routing at every tower, you can put RLs on clients out there. You can also do mangles for people opening high numbers of connections and block them if need be. xezen Long time Member Posts: 628 Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 10:23 am. Latency mon . Highest measured interrupt to process latency ( s): 619.90 Average measured interrupt to process latency ( s): 12. Highest measured interrupt to DPC latency ( s):

FIREFACE Drop Out Probleme, inkl. Monitoring Latency Mon

(is it?) between this and all features one might ever need for IPv6 but are not available yet (you know, to think more about the future than the past and to help it happen sooner), I'm all for the latter (and this kind of NAT could be added after that, if anyone would be still interested). Znevna Forum Guru Posts: 1352 Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2019 1:04 pm Re: FEATURE REQUEST: full cone NAT Fri Feb 17, 2023 8:33 pm But that behavior is not based on anything.Just some random module based on some other random implementation.Also, I saw what AnyDesk does, when you connect to a remote computer, it opens a random external port via upnp(? I didn't check via what, I'm using miniupnpd here) and maps it to localip:listenport (listenport that's always the same) so that session attempts to talk directly with your computer via that random port, not via the servers (if it can).So adding some random "feature" that would add a dst-nat rule for the said listenport would be useless for this program, as example. Amm0 Forum Guru Posts: 4593 Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 7:12 pm Location: California Contact: Re: FEATURE REQUEST: full cone NAT Fri Feb 17, 2023 9:18 pm Well, perhaps in keeping with the style, action="tetrahedron-nat"Perhaps "unmasqed-masquerade"? Sob Forum Guru Posts: 9188 Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:11 pm Re: FEATURE REQUEST: full cone NAT Fri Feb 17, 2023 10:02 pm @Znevna: I agree that it's slightly weird. I suppose you can see the possible problem and how this solves it *1, right? The weird part is, how is it actual problem, unless we're talking about some software from pre-NAT times? Because anything aware of NAT must assume that direct incoming connections don't work. It can be user error, when software supports UPnP, but user doesn't enable it. Even if there are good reasons why not enable UPnP *2, it's still user who broke it. This is for single NAT. With multi-NAT, the problem is elsewhere, it would need either some "UPnP chaining" (I didn't study it much, but PCP should have it), or this type of NAT would do the trick too.-*1 my previous description how it nicely "neutralizes" NAT*2 your suggestion to (I assume optionally) limit UPnP to allow opening ports only for own IP address would certainly improve security and remove one reason for avoiding it pe1chl Forum Guru Posts: 10587 Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm Re: FEATURE REQUEST: full cone NAT Fri Feb 17, 2023 10:19 pm Of course there is a reason why any modern solution uses "cloud servers". When everybody connects a cloud server outbound from their client behind NAT, and those cloud servers relay the traffic to the correct client, it all works perfectly.I can understand that when gaming, you want the lowest possible latency, but of course most cloud service providers have data centers all around the world and it would usually be possible to select a cloud server that adds almost