Session 53 lyrics
Author: c | 2025-04-25
SHAKIRA - BZRP Music Sessions Vol. 53 (English Lyrics) SHAKIRA - BZRP Music Sessions Vol. 53 (English Lyrics) SHAKIRA - BZRP Music Sessions Vol. 53 (Englis SHAKIRA - BZRP Music Sessions Vol. 53 (English Lyrics)SHAKIRA - BZRP Music Sessions Vol. 53 (English Lyrics)SHAKIRA - BZRP Music Sessions Vol. 53 (English Ly
Shakira - BZRP Music Sessions 53 Lyrics
72hrs" data-no-of-words="279.0" data-subsec2="858478126">Shakira lashes out at ex-partner Gerard Pique in new Bizarrap session after cheating scandal; Know what song means hereET Spotlight SpecialLast Updated: Jan 12, 2023, 07:56:00 PM ISTSynopsisIn what can be deemed her first acknowledgement of the cheating scandal involving ex-partner Gerard Pique, Shakira did not hold back from lashing out at him in her first single of 2023 “BZRP Music Session #53”.AgenciesShakira slammed her ex-partner Gerard Pique in her new single helmed by Argentina’s hitmaker DJ Bizarrap. Releasing the nearly four-minute dance-pop track, the Colombian singer appeared more empowered than ever before.Her song’s verses not only included jibes at the soccer star but also at his new girlfriend Clara Chia Marti. The song, originally released in Spanish also featured Shakira dancing and being energetic, that too, in an unapologetic manner. “BZRP Music Session #53” translation in EnglishIn the lyrics, she can be heard chanting “I’m not getting back with you, don’t cry for me, nor beg me”. She continues saying that she understands it is not her fault that “they criticize you”. Shakira also says “I only make music, sorry that it bothers you”.Moreover, giving an apparent insight into the pop star’s situation post-cheating scandal, Shakira sings that “you left me the in-laws as my neighbours” along with media outlets at her door and “in debt”. The Colombian singer declares that “you thought you hurt me” but instead, “you made me stronger”.Shakira then continues, “Women don’t cry anymore, they cash in”. Session “#53” marks the first collaboration
Shakira's BZRP Music Session 53 Lyrics
Disabled1.1.0Cryptographic ProtectionID: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-13Ownership: SharedName(Azure portal)DescriptionEffect(s)Version(GitHub)Define cryptographic useCMA_0120 - Define cryptographic useManual, Disabled1.1.0Collaborative Computing Devices and ApplicationsID: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-15Ownership: SharedName(Azure portal)DescriptionEffect(s)Version(GitHub)Explicitly notify use of collaborative computing devicesCMA_C1649 - Explicitly notify use of collaborative computing devicesManual, Disabled1.1.1Prohibit remote activation of collaborative computing devicesCMA_C1648 - Prohibit remote activation of collaborative computing devicesManual, Disabled1.1.0Public Key Infrastructure CertificatesID: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17Ownership: SharedName(Azure portal)DescriptionEffect(s)Version(GitHub)Issue public key certificatesCMA_0347 - Issue public key certificatesManual, Disabled1.1.0Mobile CodeID: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-18Ownership: SharedName(Azure portal)DescriptionEffect(s)Version(GitHub)Authorize, monitor, and control usage of mobile code technologiesCMA_C1653 - Authorize, monitor, and control usage of mobile code technologiesManual, Disabled1.1.0Define acceptable and unacceptable mobile code technologiesCMA_C1651 - Define acceptable and unacceptable mobile code technologiesManual, Disabled1.1.0Establish usage restrictions for mobile code technologiesCMA_C1652 - Establish usage restrictions for mobile code technologiesManual, Disabled1.1.0Secure Name/address Resolution Service (authoritative Source)ID: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-20Ownership: SharedName(Azure portal)DescriptionEffect(s)Version(GitHub)Implement a fault tolerant name/address serviceCMA_0305 - Implement a fault tolerant name/address serviceManual, Disabled1.1.0Provide secure name and address resolution servicesCMA_0416 - Provide secure name and address resolution servicesManual, Disabled1.1.0Secure Name/address Resolution Service (recursive or Caching Resolver)ID: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-21Ownership: SharedName(Azure portal)DescriptionEffect(s)Version(GitHub)Implement a fault tolerant name/address serviceCMA_0305 - Implement a fault tolerant name/address serviceManual, Disabled1.1.0Verify software, firmware and information integrityCMA_0542 - Verify software, firmware and information integrityManual, Disabled1.1.0Architecture and Provisioning for Name/address Resolution ServiceID: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-22Ownership: SharedName(Azure portal)DescriptionEffect(s)Version(GitHub)Implement a fault tolerant name/address serviceCMA_0305 - Implement a fault tolerant name/address serviceManual, Disabled1.1.0Session AuthenticityID: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-23Ownership: SharedName(Azure portal)DescriptionEffect(s)Version(GitHub)Configure workstations to check for digital certificatesCMA_0073 - Configure workstations to check for digital certificatesManual, Disabled1.1.0Enforce random unique session identifiersCMA_0247 - Enforce random unique session identifiersManual, Disabled1.1.0Invalidate Session Identifiers at LogoutID: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-23 (1)Ownership: SharedName(Azure portal)DescriptionEffect(s)Version(GitHub)Invalidate session identifiers at logoutCMA_C1661 - InvalidateMusic Sessions 53 (Lyrics) Flashcards - Quizlet
Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question. I Finally finished adding all of the song lyrics on my Itunes after I synced with my ipod I've been having problems seeing some of the lyrics of a certain album, for the entire album whenever I try to see the lyric I get this message "Lyrics Detected, but unable to retrieve". Anybody know what might be wrong? Kinda dissapointing to see that happens after all the work I had going after the lyrics. I tried restoring my Ipod but it didn't work. Windows XP Posted on Jul 17, 2008 8:22 PM Jul 18, 2008 9:37 AM in response to JuninhooFL Welcome to the discussions, JuninhooFL. As you were adding lyrics, were you checking to make sure they were viewable on the iPod? Or, did you just add them all at once? Just trying to see if you've ever been able to see any of them. Jul 18, 2008 10:30 AM in response to JuninhooFL I Added them all at once, I googled the lyrics then copy and pasted them under the lyrics tab on Itunes. I checked some of these lyrics to see if by any chance there could have been any "wierd" character that Itunes might not recognize but there werent any. Jul 18, 2008 11:01 AM in response to JuninhooFL Try this, Open a song, copy the lyrics to TextEdit, then close the lyric window. In TextEdit, press Command-Shift-T. That converts the text to a raw text format. Select it all, then copy. Then, open that song again, paste these lyrics into it, close the lyric window then sync. When you do this, does the lyrics work? Jul 18, 2008 2:53 PM in response to Kyn Drake Just tried. SHAKIRA - BZRP Music Sessions Vol. 53 (English Lyrics) SHAKIRA - BZRP Music Sessions Vol. 53 (English Lyrics) SHAKIRA - BZRP Music Sessions Vol. 53 (EnglisShakira Ft. Bizarrap - Lyrics 53 Music Sessions 53 (Video
Note that in this example every request is actually suspended. At this moment the server is basically doing nothing. We have 4 sessions (54, 55, 56 and 57) waiting on the same lock (the row with the key lock resource KEY: 5:72057594039369728 (ac11a2bc89a9)). Session 54 is waiting on session 55 and session 55 is waiting on session 53 which means really session 54 is waiting on session 53. So everybody waits on session 53, which is waiting for the disk controller to write a log record on disk. We can also see, from the wait_time column, how long has each session waited for: about 160 milliseconds. Notice how in the previous example we had only one request actually running out of 5. I’m running these queries on a workstation with 8 cores, plenty of RAM and a decent disk, so there is plenty of hardware to carry these requests, but instead they are most of the times waiting instead of executing.To make your requests faster you need to have them be executing rather than waitingIs having most (or even all) requests waiting, rather than executing, something unusual? Not at all, this is the norm! Any time you will look at a SQL Server executing an even moderate load, you’ll see that most requests are waiting and only a few are executing. What you need to watch out for a long waits or short but repeated waits that add up. Long waits indicate some resource that is held for long times, and typically this occurs with locks. Repeated short waits indicate a resource that is being saturated, possibly a hot spot for performance.Before I go further I just want to show sys.dm_os_waiting_tasks, which is a SQL Server DMV specifically designed to show currently waiting tasks:select * from sys.dm_os_waiting_taskswhere r.session_id >= 50andMusic Sessions 53 - Lyrics and Music by Shakira ft. Bizarrap / BZRP 53
R.session_id @@spid;Session 53 is waiting the log to flushSession 57 is waiting for 40 ms for a lock on a row and is blocked by session 53 (which therefore must be owning the lock)Session 54 is waiting for 37 ms for a lock on a row and is blocked by session 57 (but session 57 is in turn blocked by session 53)The situation we have here is much similar to the previous one, where we had 4 SELECT sessions blocked by an INSERT. He can see here two requests blocked by attempting to read a row (so they’re probably SELECT) and they blocking session is waiting for its transaction to durably commit. The information in this DMV is very similar to the one in sys.dm_exec_requests and the later one has more information, but there is one important case where the information in sys.dm_exec_requests is misleading: parallel queries.To understand CXPACKET wait types you need to look into child parallel tasksWhen a statement can benefit from parallel execution the engine will create multiple tasks for the request, each processing a subset of the data. Each one of these tasks can execute on a separate CPU/core. The request communicate with these tasks using basically a producer-consumer queue. The query operator implementing this queue is called an Exchange operator (I’m really simplifying here, read The Parallelism Operator (aka Exchange) for a more accurate description). If this producer-consumer queue is empty (meaning the producers did not push any data into it) the consumer must suspend and wait and the corresponding wait type is the CXPACKET wait type. Requests that show this wait type are really showing that the tasks which should had produced data to consume are not producing any (or enough) data. These producer tasks in turn may be suspended, waiting on some otherMusic Sessions 53 Lyrics in English Bizarrap, Shakira
75$-100$ for a full song with 2-3 guitar tracks – rhythm guitar and short solo. For a more complex project like for example long and complex arrangement 120$-150$ per song Is normal considering the long hours put into the song.RELATED: 6 reasons to hire remote session musiciansWhat services do you get from online session guitarists?The services of a session guitarist include multiple services which I will try to explain here. Other than the typical rhythm guitar and solo for the song extra service might includeDRY files, meaning the DI of the recorded guitars along with the WET tracks. Most guitar players include this on price but some charge extra for it.Mixed tracks – when you ask for multiple guitars or a guitar arrangement guitar players might send the wet tracks to you properly mixed which each other or with the song.Acoustic/Electric or both – Asking for both of them in a song would normally be considered an extra service since the process is completely different for recording them.Making acoustic or rock versions of songs – The service would include for example having a U2 song and asking for an acoustic backing track on which you can sing over.Guitar Loops or Guitar loop packs to which you can ask the right of usage or right of selling.Guitar-centered soundtracks – here you pay for the writing, recording, and rights of the song.In my case, I offer full acoustic versions of songs with the singer of my band and also producing guitar-centered songs.Check out my services hereRemember that the best way to have the best value for your price is to contact first and then explain all you can in detail and be as specific as you can. Ask what you need but do trust the session musician’s judgment and style in adding parts and arranging guitars. Sometimes you have to play the parts to understand if they fit or not!Try to avoid unnecessary revisions by being clear and sending references cause they do normally cost extra and take time to finish.What instruction should you send to online session musicians?You should first of all text them and know a bit more about their style and thought on your project. I do offer a FREE CONSULTING on your project if you would be interested in adding guitar tracks to your songs. You should always send:Reference tracks/artists if you have anyThe chord chart and lyrics (very important!)BPM of the songExplain how much creative freedom you would like on the trackReference on the tones used and the general moodHow many guitar tracks do you need (only if you know what you need for the mix) otherwise you can leave it up to them to decideSpecify if you need double tracking or notOne point of this all that many find controversial is to send the lyrics to the musician. Many session musicians might totally ignore the lyrics but I am not one of them. Personally, I like to go through the lyrics and know what the story. SHAKIRA - BZRP Music Sessions Vol. 53 (English Lyrics) SHAKIRA - BZRP Music Sessions Vol. 53 (English Lyrics) SHAKIRA - BZRP Music Sessions Vol. 53 (Englis SHAKIRA - BZRP Music Sessions Vol. 53 (English Lyrics)SHAKIRA - BZRP Music Sessions Vol. 53 (English Lyrics)SHAKIRA - BZRP Music Sessions Vol. 53 (English LyComments
72hrs" data-no-of-words="279.0" data-subsec2="858478126">Shakira lashes out at ex-partner Gerard Pique in new Bizarrap session after cheating scandal; Know what song means hereET Spotlight SpecialLast Updated: Jan 12, 2023, 07:56:00 PM ISTSynopsisIn what can be deemed her first acknowledgement of the cheating scandal involving ex-partner Gerard Pique, Shakira did not hold back from lashing out at him in her first single of 2023 “BZRP Music Session #53”.AgenciesShakira slammed her ex-partner Gerard Pique in her new single helmed by Argentina’s hitmaker DJ Bizarrap. Releasing the nearly four-minute dance-pop track, the Colombian singer appeared more empowered than ever before.Her song’s verses not only included jibes at the soccer star but also at his new girlfriend Clara Chia Marti. The song, originally released in Spanish also featured Shakira dancing and being energetic, that too, in an unapologetic manner. “BZRP Music Session #53” translation in EnglishIn the lyrics, she can be heard chanting “I’m not getting back with you, don’t cry for me, nor beg me”. She continues saying that she understands it is not her fault that “they criticize you”. Shakira also says “I only make music, sorry that it bothers you”.Moreover, giving an apparent insight into the pop star’s situation post-cheating scandal, Shakira sings that “you left me the in-laws as my neighbours” along with media outlets at her door and “in debt”. The Colombian singer declares that “you thought you hurt me” but instead, “you made me stronger”.Shakira then continues, “Women don’t cry anymore, they cash in”. Session “#53” marks the first collaboration
2025-03-29Disabled1.1.0Cryptographic ProtectionID: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-13Ownership: SharedName(Azure portal)DescriptionEffect(s)Version(GitHub)Define cryptographic useCMA_0120 - Define cryptographic useManual, Disabled1.1.0Collaborative Computing Devices and ApplicationsID: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-15Ownership: SharedName(Azure portal)DescriptionEffect(s)Version(GitHub)Explicitly notify use of collaborative computing devicesCMA_C1649 - Explicitly notify use of collaborative computing devicesManual, Disabled1.1.1Prohibit remote activation of collaborative computing devicesCMA_C1648 - Prohibit remote activation of collaborative computing devicesManual, Disabled1.1.0Public Key Infrastructure CertificatesID: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17Ownership: SharedName(Azure portal)DescriptionEffect(s)Version(GitHub)Issue public key certificatesCMA_0347 - Issue public key certificatesManual, Disabled1.1.0Mobile CodeID: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-18Ownership: SharedName(Azure portal)DescriptionEffect(s)Version(GitHub)Authorize, monitor, and control usage of mobile code technologiesCMA_C1653 - Authorize, monitor, and control usage of mobile code technologiesManual, Disabled1.1.0Define acceptable and unacceptable mobile code technologiesCMA_C1651 - Define acceptable and unacceptable mobile code technologiesManual, Disabled1.1.0Establish usage restrictions for mobile code technologiesCMA_C1652 - Establish usage restrictions for mobile code technologiesManual, Disabled1.1.0Secure Name/address Resolution Service (authoritative Source)ID: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-20Ownership: SharedName(Azure portal)DescriptionEffect(s)Version(GitHub)Implement a fault tolerant name/address serviceCMA_0305 - Implement a fault tolerant name/address serviceManual, Disabled1.1.0Provide secure name and address resolution servicesCMA_0416 - Provide secure name and address resolution servicesManual, Disabled1.1.0Secure Name/address Resolution Service (recursive or Caching Resolver)ID: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-21Ownership: SharedName(Azure portal)DescriptionEffect(s)Version(GitHub)Implement a fault tolerant name/address serviceCMA_0305 - Implement a fault tolerant name/address serviceManual, Disabled1.1.0Verify software, firmware and information integrityCMA_0542 - Verify software, firmware and information integrityManual, Disabled1.1.0Architecture and Provisioning for Name/address Resolution ServiceID: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-22Ownership: SharedName(Azure portal)DescriptionEffect(s)Version(GitHub)Implement a fault tolerant name/address serviceCMA_0305 - Implement a fault tolerant name/address serviceManual, Disabled1.1.0Session AuthenticityID: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-23Ownership: SharedName(Azure portal)DescriptionEffect(s)Version(GitHub)Configure workstations to check for digital certificatesCMA_0073 - Configure workstations to check for digital certificatesManual, Disabled1.1.0Enforce random unique session identifiersCMA_0247 - Enforce random unique session identifiersManual, Disabled1.1.0Invalidate Session Identifiers at LogoutID: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-23 (1)Ownership: SharedName(Azure portal)DescriptionEffect(s)Version(GitHub)Invalidate session identifiers at logoutCMA_C1661 - Invalidate
2025-04-11Note that in this example every request is actually suspended. At this moment the server is basically doing nothing. We have 4 sessions (54, 55, 56 and 57) waiting on the same lock (the row with the key lock resource KEY: 5:72057594039369728 (ac11a2bc89a9)). Session 54 is waiting on session 55 and session 55 is waiting on session 53 which means really session 54 is waiting on session 53. So everybody waits on session 53, which is waiting for the disk controller to write a log record on disk. We can also see, from the wait_time column, how long has each session waited for: about 160 milliseconds. Notice how in the previous example we had only one request actually running out of 5. I’m running these queries on a workstation with 8 cores, plenty of RAM and a decent disk, so there is plenty of hardware to carry these requests, but instead they are most of the times waiting instead of executing.To make your requests faster you need to have them be executing rather than waitingIs having most (or even all) requests waiting, rather than executing, something unusual? Not at all, this is the norm! Any time you will look at a SQL Server executing an even moderate load, you’ll see that most requests are waiting and only a few are executing. What you need to watch out for a long waits or short but repeated waits that add up. Long waits indicate some resource that is held for long times, and typically this occurs with locks. Repeated short waits indicate a resource that is being saturated, possibly a hot spot for performance.Before I go further I just want to show sys.dm_os_waiting_tasks, which is a SQL Server DMV specifically designed to show currently waiting tasks:select * from sys.dm_os_waiting_taskswhere r.session_id >= 50and
2025-04-03R.session_id @@spid;Session 53 is waiting the log to flushSession 57 is waiting for 40 ms for a lock on a row and is blocked by session 53 (which therefore must be owning the lock)Session 54 is waiting for 37 ms for a lock on a row and is blocked by session 57 (but session 57 is in turn blocked by session 53)The situation we have here is much similar to the previous one, where we had 4 SELECT sessions blocked by an INSERT. He can see here two requests blocked by attempting to read a row (so they’re probably SELECT) and they blocking session is waiting for its transaction to durably commit. The information in this DMV is very similar to the one in sys.dm_exec_requests and the later one has more information, but there is one important case where the information in sys.dm_exec_requests is misleading: parallel queries.To understand CXPACKET wait types you need to look into child parallel tasksWhen a statement can benefit from parallel execution the engine will create multiple tasks for the request, each processing a subset of the data. Each one of these tasks can execute on a separate CPU/core. The request communicate with these tasks using basically a producer-consumer queue. The query operator implementing this queue is called an Exchange operator (I’m really simplifying here, read The Parallelism Operator (aka Exchange) for a more accurate description). If this producer-consumer queue is empty (meaning the producers did not push any data into it) the consumer must suspend and wait and the corresponding wait type is the CXPACKET wait type. Requests that show this wait type are really showing that the tasks which should had produced data to consume are not producing any (or enough) data. These producer tasks in turn may be suspended, waiting on some other
2025-04-23Sogn Meaning of BZRP Music Sessions #53 by Shakira(alternatively known as "Out of Your League" in English and "Pa' Tipos Como Tú" in Spanish)The song allegedly "broke the internet," setting numerous records for viewership and listenership for a Latin song and serving as both a diss track directed at Shakira's ex-boyfriend, footballer Gerard Piqué, and a song advocating for women's empowerment. It has received appreciation for its appealing melody and lyrics as well as for the role that Bizarrap had in giving Shakira a fresh sound.Shakira and Gerard Piqué first met in 2010, and they started dating in 2011. They eventually had two sons together. They broke up in 2022.Shakira wanted to make a song that was more revengeful, so collaborated to write a tune that didn't go too far or be too delicate for her.In the song, Shakira criticises Piqué for his media controversies that made her the target, for relocating his mother next door, and for their relationship leading the Spanish treasury to pursue her taxes in the song's lyrics, which make numerous references to Piqué and their relationship.While the terms "claramente" and "salpique," which have deliberate pauses, highlight "clara" and "pique," respectively, they relate to Piqué and his new lover, Clara Chá Marti.The former soccer player, Pique, was pictured with Marti at the Summerfest Cerdanya music festival just three months after Piqué and Shakira disclosed their breakup. The song was number one on Billboard Hot Latin Songs and in 16 other countries.BZRP Music Sessions #53 lyrics by
2025-03-30